<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Conversant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/</link>
	<description>Greg Pierce's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Pierce</title>
		<link>http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>
On Jan 14, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Seth Dillingham wrote:

&#62; Nevermind the funding. What "killer application" would you imagine
&#62; if Macrobyte (or anybody) had a big budget of time and money?

Just a very focused, streamlined implementation as a Weblog tool, or 
CMS, or online forum, or other Internet application with a great 
"out-of-the-signup-page" UI experience for just that one purpose...with 
everything that was extraneous to that purpose turned off or hidden.

Something that you could explain anyone interested in that type of web 
service in one sentence or two.

g.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Jan 14, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Seth Dillingham wrote:</p>
<p>&gt; Nevermind the funding. What &#8220;killer application&#8221; would you imagine<br />
&gt; if Macrobyte (or anybody) had a big budget of time and money?</p>
<p>Just a very focused, streamlined implementation as a Weblog tool, or<br />
CMS, or online forum, or other Internet application with a great<br />
&#8220;out-of-the-signup-page&#8221; UI experience for just that one purpose&#8230;with<br />
everything that was extraneous to that purpose turned off or hidden.</p>
<p>Something that you could explain anyone interested in that type of web<br />
service in one sentence or two.</p>
<p>g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Dillingham</title>
		<link>http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Dillingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greg.agiletortoise.com/2005/01/14/what-is-conversant-2/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>On 1/14/05, Greg Pierce said:

&#62;Seth posted a long overview outline about Conversant -- the
&#62;software that runs this website.  I love Conversant, it's a great
&#62;tool once you "get" it.  Unfortunately, I think this outline draws
&#62;attention to one of the main reasons more people haven't "gotten"
&#62;it.  While very powerful, it's never been focused on a particular
&#62;killer application that demonstrates it's power easily to a new
&#62;user.

Nevermind the funding. What "killer application" would you imagine
if Macrobyte (or anybody) had a big budget of time and money?

&#62;It's flexibility is incredible, but to get new users involved it's
&#62;really going to need that killer focused application with a great
&#62;UI and initial experience.  If there was only someone around to
&#62;fund the development of that killer app.

Well, the great initial experience is easier to solve. We really
need new sites to come with more of our modern features, and better
looking templates. That would make a huge difference.

Seth

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/14/05, Greg Pierce said:</p>
<p>&gt;Seth posted a long overview outline about Conversant &#8212; the<br />
&gt;software that runs this website.  I love Conversant, it&#8217;s a great<br />
&gt;tool once you &#8220;get&#8221; it.  Unfortunately, I think this outline draws<br />
&gt;attention to one of the main reasons more people haven&#8217;t &#8220;gotten&#8221;<br />
&gt;it.  While very powerful, it&#8217;s never been focused on a particular<br />
&gt;killer application that demonstrates it&#8217;s power easily to a new<br />
&gt;user.</p>
<p>Nevermind the funding. What &#8220;killer application&#8221; would you imagine<br />
if Macrobyte (or anybody) had a big budget of time and money?</p>
<p>&gt;It&#8217;s flexibility is incredible, but to get new users involved it&#8217;s<br />
&gt;really going to need that killer focused application with a great<br />
&gt;UI and initial experience.  If there was only someone around to<br />
&gt;fund the development of that killer app.</p>
<p>Well, the great initial experience is easier to solve. We really<br />
need new sites to come with more of our modern features, and better<br />
looking templates. That would make a huge difference.</p>
<p>Seth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
